home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.ping.at!usenet
- From: matzing@ping.at (Manfred Matzinger)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.networking
- Subject: Re: ppp/slip - which is faster ?
- Date: 21 Feb 96 07:44:49 +0100
- Organization: Private Site
- Message-ID: <977.6625T464T2486@ping.at>
- References: <packages.44.000A7737@gil.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au>
- Reply-To: matzing@ping.at
- NNTP-Posting-Host: s045.ping.at
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)
-
-
- Hi!
-
- On 21-Feb-96 16:27:52, Michael Moran <packages@gil.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au> wrote:
- MM> Which is the faster for amitcp - ppp or slip ?
- MM> I have found that if I ping my service provider, slip seems to run faster.
- MM> I thought ppp was supposed to be faster.
-
- PINGing is no good way to test the speed of your sana-device.
- IMHO the speed of PPP (registered only) is similar to compressed slip.
-
- Herzliche Grⁿ▀e
- Best regards
- Manfred Matzinger
-
- "Too much of a good thing is WONDERFUL."
- --
- | Manfred Matzinger Brenekgasse 2 Tel,FAX on request: (+43)2252/24331 |
- | matzing@ping.at A-2500 Baden,AUSTRIA PGP-Key FB13DAFD on Servers |
- | ... UI120:EEHHHLMSIJICLLZHGEECCHIALBEHBIIFALAURDIEKAJ IRC-Nick: Matzi |
- | |
- | ##NEW HOMEPAGE - NEW LINKS ADDED## http://ping.at/members/matzing/index.htm |
-
-
-